Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. Vivo X60 Pro's design is a lot newer, just a little thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy A7 (2017). The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px, a quite greater pixels number per inch of screen and a bigger display.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a much higher (4K) video resolution. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.