Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s 84.2 score. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), but they are equally thin. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little greater pixels density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has 2 less cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has improved battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 32% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.