Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than Google Pixel, getting a global score of 84.2 against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) body is notably newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Google Pixel. Google Pixel has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 19% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.