Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), with an 87.5 score against 84.2. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), but they weight the same. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little bit greater pixels number in each screen inch, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018). Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.