Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the Honor 50 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Honor 50 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676, a bit bigger screen and a little bit better pixel density. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 50 Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 21% bigger battery size. Honor 50 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.