Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. Even though the Galaxy A7 (2018) and the LG G7 Fit were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is a little heavier but a bit thinner than the LG G7 Fit.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit faster CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A7 (2018) takes clearer photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light environments, a back camera with a lot better 24 megapixels resolution and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.