Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s score of 84.2. LG K92's design is way newer than the Galaxy A7 (2018)'s, although it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
LG K92 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little faster processor than LG K92. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG K92 features better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher video resolution and a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.