Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy A7 (2018)'s design is a little heavier and a bit thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a smaller camera sensor and a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher (4K) video definition. The LG V30S ThinQ's battery performance is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A7 (2018).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.