Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-10-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 84.2 score against 81.3. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A7 (2018) is an a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size display, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater screen density.
LG V35 ThinQ features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2018). They have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a lot worse 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
The LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy A7 (2018) both have extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.