Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), with an 87.6 score against 84.2. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), although it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) and the LG V60 ThinQ count with quite similar displays, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger screen.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.