Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body has the same weight and thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures, a lot more MP back facing camera and a much higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.