Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a general score of 84.2 against 83.4. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger display. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.