Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s global score of 84.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.