Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G, getting an 84.2 score against 81.5. The Galaxy A7 (2018) design is extremely lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little bit better screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot higher video quality. Motorola Moto G 5G features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.