Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Surfing blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having an 84.2 score against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is an older cellphone than Moto G 5G Plus, but Samsung could make it lighter and somewhat thinner. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a CPU that is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although the Moto G 5G Plus has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy A7 (2018), because although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.