Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Smoke black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than Moto G Power, it's design is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little faster processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Moto G Power captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture and a same size back camera sensor, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Power features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.