Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2018), with an 86.2 score against 84.2. The Motorola Moto G200 5G construction is notably newer, but heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2018). Moto G200 5G and Galaxy A7 (2018) feature really similar displays, because although the Moto G200 5G has a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.