Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is an way older device than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, but Samsung managed to make it a lot thinner and noticeably lighter. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a sharper display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2220px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) and Motorola Moto G9 Power both feature very similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and equal internal storage. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has an 82% more battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with higher video frame rates and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.