Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a global score of 84.2 against 75.8. Although Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of 2200 megahertz cores and more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z Force takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a lower 21 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way better video definition.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.