Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-10-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting an 84.2 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is newer, but heavier and notably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A7 (2018) captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 24 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A7 (2018) features just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.