Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Despite being the best device we are comparing, Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is just a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Moto Z3. Motorola Moto Z3 has a screen that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s display, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse pixels number per inch in the screen, they both have a same size display.
The Moto Z3 has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a back camera with a lot higher 24 mega pixels resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.