Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-10-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it is also a bit thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a quite better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
The Moto Z3 Play has a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features just a little better battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.