Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-10-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with an 84.2 score against 80. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the Motorola One Zoom, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Zoom captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Zoom has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.