Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), having a overall score of 87 against 84.2. Although Motorola razr (2020) is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.