Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 84.2 against 75.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's construction is much thinner and extremely lighter. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little larger screen.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot better video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.