Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s general score of 84.2. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little higher pixels density, a bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a way more MP back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.