Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 84.2 against 80.1. The Galaxy A7 (2018) body is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released only 18 months before. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 24 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.