Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 84.2 score against 81. Although Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's construction is notably lighter and noticeably thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) both have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s processing unit, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more internal storage.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 23% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower (Full HD) video definition, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.