Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a global score of 84.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro design is just a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A70. Apple iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A70 counts with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate and a bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.