Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 80.3 score against 76.9. Although Google Nexus 6P is older than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display density.
The Galaxy A70 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A70 features superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.