Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. The LG V50 ThinQ construction weights the same than the Galaxy A70, but it is a little thicker. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display. LG V50 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V50 ThinQ also has better video frame rate, a larger camera aperture and a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.