Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 76.9 score against 76.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy A70 is a notably newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it's just a little heavier.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, they both have the same video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.