Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, with a score of 77.9 against 76.9. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing you some additional features. The Motorola DROID Turbo is an a lot older and thicker device than Galaxy A70, but Motorola managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video and worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, they both have the same (4K) video quality.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.