Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, having an 81.2 score against 76.9. These phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 is a a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A70, but they have the same thickness.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.