Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it gives some extra features and improved performance. The Motorola Moto G Stylus design is newer than Samsung Galaxy A70's, although it's thicker and a little bit heavier.
Galaxy A70 and Moto G Stylus have similar screens, because although the Moto G Stylus has a little worse 1080 x 2300 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G Stylus's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A70 one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and equal internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A70 has a bit longer battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus is a bit more expensive than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.