Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. The Moto Z4 is a a little lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy A70, even when both were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a display that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A70, because although the Motorola Moto Z4 has a little smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z4 and Samsung Galaxy A70 both feature incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.