Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A70, having a overall score of 79.9 against 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. OPPO Find X3 Pro's body is newer than Galaxy A70's, but it's a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution and a greater pixel number per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery life is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A70's battery life. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.