Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Galaxy A70 comes with Android 10 OS. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is newer than Galaxy A70, it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.