Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A70, with a overall score of 81 against 76.9. Galaxy C9 Pro's construction is somewhat thinner than Galaxy A70, although it's a little heavier and was released many years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bigger display and a just a little higher pixel density. The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
Galaxy A70 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy C9 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.