Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 has a score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Xperia XZ3's construction is just a bit heavier and noticeably thicker than Samsung Galaxy A70. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features greater battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3330mAh.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A70, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.