Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features. Vivo X60 Pro's design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy A70.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The vivo X60 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor capturing much better quality pictures and better video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has just a little bit longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.