Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a global score of 85.5 against 76.9. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is thicker but a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and both were released only 8 months apart. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and higher video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more than the Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.