Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a little bit better than iPhone XS Max's score of 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer and a little lighter device than the iPhone XS Max, although it is just a little thicker. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density and a slightly better 1242 x 2688px resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.