Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Google Pixel XL, with a score of 92.9 against 81.3. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's just a little thinner and also much newer. The Google Pixel XL features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features greater battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.