Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a lot better than LG V20's 77 global score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a much newer cellphone than the LG V20, but it is just a little thicker and just a little heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V20 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG V20, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.