Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-16 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than LG V30's overall score of 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is notably newer than the LG V30's, although it's thicker and heavier. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
LG V30 has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V30, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with greater battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than the LG V30, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.