Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is better than the LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body has the same thickness than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's just a bit heavier. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.