Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's extremely thinner and also a lot newer. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has less processing cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.