Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is notably newer and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is also a little heavier. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.