Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola Edge 50, having a score of 92.9 against 81.2. Even being the best device we are comparing here, the Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is extremely older, a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a just a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.